My learning adventure continues each week, as I have recently been introduced to additional modalities that can be called upon to facilitate a beneficial “shift” in one’s health and well-being. Among these are PSYCH-K, which I recently did a Talk For Food show on with Jeanne Northington, a PSYCH-K practitioner and instructor from Tuscaloosa, AL. (Click here to listen.)

This journey will continue in a few months when I meet Rob Williams, the developer of PSYCH-K, when he returns home to Crestone, CO. I had a great conversation with him by phone last week, and look forward to meeting him in person.

Another is Alphabiotics, a healing modality that has been around for over 20 years, developed by Dr. Virgil Chrane. I spent some time with Dr. Chrane last week, on camera. This is something worth paying attention to. I will write more on Alphabiotics soon, and release some of the video, as well as a future Talk For Food radiocast.

But our lessons in structured water continue as well, as are the insights. This week I sat down with Clayton Nolte, developer of the “greenest” structuring device you can imagine, now under the Utopic Water brand, and Brydon Bigcharles, who is creating a business structure for marketing, and selling the product, the demand for which is sure to grow as we further understand the nature of water itself.

The clip below is the first of 7 or 8 videos that will be spawned from that afternoon, as “Three Agua Amigos” who talk about structured water each day, and let the insights fly!

Utopic Structure Water products are available here.

From his location in Africa, Jim Humble sent me, in encrypted form, his own assessment of Mr. Nash’s accusations surrounding the death of his wife Sylvie. I’ll simply publish it as received, without further comment. ~AA

October 16, 2009 — 5:42:12 AM

Subject: Response to Doug Nash

As I have already said, the loss of one’s wife is probably the greatest loss that one will ever experience and thousands of people have also mourned his loss, and so do I. I shall never wish him anything but the best of wishes for the loss he has experienced.

Having said that, there is the other side of the story that no one seems to want to face, so let me state it. After all I am probably the one person in the world who should state it. Immediately after his wife’s death Mr. Nash started on his attack of MMS. Without knowing anything about MMS, or bothering to learn anything about MMS, Mr. Nash embarked on a program to destroy a chemical that is probably at this time the most important chemical that mankind has. Out of the estimated 2 million people who have already used MMS there are at least 100 thousand lives saved and more hundreds of thousands of people have overcome their suffering and returned to living their lives back in a normal fashion.

Then if Mr. Nash had of checked just a little bit of the chemistry, because the data is readily available, he would have found that MMS is a natural chemical manufactured by the human immune system to help prevent diseases and to keep the body healthy. He didn’t check at the time and he is not checking now. All he wants is his revenge by destroying the public’s faith in this chemical and to create fear in the public’s minds. The fact is, he is taking his revenge out not on just the public, but on humanity in general. Any person in his situation must accept a certain responsibility to mankind. His statements will destroy many people’s chance to again live a normal life. In a situation of this importance most normal people are up to taking the kind of responsibility that would demand that they review the items in question and absolutely know their ground. I’ve seen it many times. Normal people just step up and do what is necessary. Here is a man, Mr. Nash, stepping up and doing what is totally unnecessary. Every time Mr. Nash sends one of his heart breaking messages he hurts hundreds if not thousands of people who will probably never use MMS because of his message.

I am 77 years old and I have studied the human psyche for over 50 years. I traveled the world and spent several hundred thousand hard earned dollars to take courses, therapy, buy books, and study with people from around the globe. My studies tell me that when a person takes such a huge disregard for his responsibility to mankind there is a reason. He is reacting like an extremely guilty man. In my opinion he is lying about something that he feels he must keep secret at all costs. Now I know that there is going to be a lot of people out there saying how terrible and unfeeling I am to say anything like this when he has experience such a terrible loss, but don’t you see I would be shirking my responsibility if I did not tell the public what I believe.

Thirteen years ago, I stood in the jungle of Guyana and accepted the responsibility to take the cure that I had found to mankind. I had also found gold in the jungle, and I could have continued being a prospector. But I accepted my responsibility and I risked my life at that time to prove my discovery. I would be shirking my responsibility, now, to not at least say what I believe.

From Mr. Nash’s actions and reactions I believe that he is lying about something in the situation that happened. I don’t know what, but I know that most people have a much greater sense of responsibility to mankind than Mr. Nash has demonstrated. In fact he as demonstrated a total lack of any kind of that responsibility and is showing an attack. In observing men in situations throughout the world where they have had losses or special situations have been thrust on them, most rise to the occasion. Only a few throw their chance to prove their worth to the wind. I believe that he is directing the attention of the public and police way from himself by ranting about MMS. It is my suggestion that Mr. Nash be completely investigated. If I had the money I would pay for it to be done, but my money is like I have always said, for the people here in Africa. If you think that is unfeeling, I am sorry. It is my job to protect MMS. There were people who witnessed his wife die, but how many people witnessed the rest of the day? We only know that she was in a comma. We need to know what happened the rest of that day, before people arrived. I am sorry, but Mr. Nash is trying too hard to blame it all on MMS. He is screaming MMS so loudly no one is looking at him. Well I can’t do anything from here in Africa. But I suggest that the police take a good look at Mr. Nash. Any person even slightly responsible would ask for an investigation. They wouldn’t rave about something they knew nothing about. Do you see? He isn’t even waiting for the autopsy reports, he is trying to do as much damage as he can before the report comes out.

I would like to point out that 2 drops that he said his wife had couldn’t possibly have caused what he claims. I have given more than two drops to a very tiny baby puppy without them even vomiting. In Africa and Mexico I have give two drops to hundreds of babies with malaria and dozens of other diseases. I have seen more people take MMS than anyone else in the world certainly more than 5000 people. Not even one person per thousand has done more than vomit 30 seconds and they didn’t last a full minute of vomiting. Now that I think about it, Mr. Nash is showing an amazing method of attack. It is like he already had the plan of attack in mind. Either he has an amazing knowledge of the Internet and the various blogs or he has some help finding the places to send his heart breaking but hate messages. I can state that I know that two drops couldn’t cause that reaction that he has told us. MMS is not a catalyst. It is an oxidizer. If the autopsy says different then we know that she had much more than 2 drops. A man in Los Angeles took 1/2 of a bottle of MMS that’s 2.75 ounces or 1403 drops. He went to the hospital, but he didn’t die. Do you see, 1403 drops didn’t kill this man and 2 drops killed Nash’s wife? Two drops cannot last in the human body longer than 1.5 hours. So if they find MMS in her body, we know something happened other than what he said. You can kill anyone by forcing too much of anything down their throat, too much water, or salt, or sugar, or anything else.

So please, any of you, don’t follow Nash’s example. Take a few minutes to at least check MMS out. At this point you too have a certain responsibility to your family, and at least to your friends and neighbors. If MMS really works, and you are willing to check that out, the fact is you will save someone’s life within the next 5 years simply because you know what it does. That is the exact statistics of it. If you don’t know that MMS works, then whoever it is will just die like they normally would, and you will probably never realize it. Statistics says that everyone in the US comes in contact at least once every 5 years with someone that is about to die. Of course, most people don’t recognize it when it happens, but it does happen. And like it or not, as a member of the human race, you also have a certain responsibility to that person that you will come in contact with in the future. Please accept that responsibility now. You will feel better knowing that you can save a life when the time comes. – Jim Humble

It’s been over two years since I was first introduced to MMS. While that represents childhood and adolescence in dog years, it seems even longer in “MMS years,” given the tremendous rise in acceptance of the protocol. The possibility of a death being tied the ingestion of MMS has been long speculated, especially before there were many experienced users of the product and protocol. Now, after an estimated 1 million people have used, or are using MMS, tens of thousands of which reporting relief from such conditions as diabetes, psoriasis, asthma, pneumonia, malaria, tuberculosis, migraine headaches, parasites, AIDS and many forms of cancer, the day of accusation has come.

With all of the benefits that have been realized, and more to be learned, it did not come as a surprise when a death would be tied to the use of MMS, as happened in August 2009. The story has been published online, titled, “MMS KILLED MY WIFE” (www.latitude38.com/letters/200910.html), and in numerous forums. It is a heart-breaking story, such as it was written by Doug Nash about his beloved wife Sylvie. And yet, with what is now know about how MMS works, supported by thousands of cases, Mr. Nash’s conclusion as to the cause of Sylvie’s death doesn’t ring true. This doesn’t diminish his grief, but it does temper the efficacy of his conclusion, especially since both of them knew relatively little about the protocol.

Nonetheless, I wanted to offer my own condolences to Mr. Nash for his loss, no matter what the true cause is. I sat down before my video camera and offered a few more thoughts about this event, as it means that more people will be learning about MMS, and they, like Mr. Nash and Sylvie, should understand what they’re doing.

This is not to say that MMS can kill you, or that it should be used with fear. Any number of over-the-counter remedies, if used improperly, can bring about a swift death. Yet, the general medical and media response will be to call for greater awareness and care, not question whether the remedy is helpful. That would be the appropriate response in this case, as the real cause of death is ascertained.

Yet, we shouldn’t resist the questioning, for MMS doesn’t need anyone to defend it, any more than Mother Nature does. It will continue doing what it has done because it is a gift of Nature that, if understood and used wisely, can yield great benefits, and if used incorrectly, can bring tragedy. That’s the real truth here, because a tragedy did happen, and chlorine dioxide simply is.

Because of how it works and its small expense, MMS would be a highly effective remedy for any flu condition, whether man made (i.e., H1N1) or otherwise. This is because the flu’s catalyzing agent would inherently be of a low pH value, in the acidic spectrum, which is the specific range of chlorine dioxide’s reactivity.

MMS is not a “cure” for the many conditions that have improved as a result of its use. It simply reduces the factors — many of which are the result of over acidity — that contribute to the disease pathologies.

by George Frederick Watts (1884)

In the Bible it is written that “The love of money is the root of all evil” (1 Timothy 6:10). From many perspectives, there appears to be much truth to the adage. Yet, in The Kybalion, another book of ancient wisdom, it is written that “all truths are but half-truths.” And while the latter might appear to “dilute” the former, it doesn’t mean that either of them are “wrong.”

Money is on everyone’s mind. It appears to be behind all that gets done, and all that is yet undone appears to be waiting the arrival of a financial consort.

“How will we pay for it?” is the incessant refrain in debates over health care, as though ideas that work are only those that carry a price tag. Modern medicine has been so inept at abating the rising tide of disease that fundraising — “for the cure” — has become big business. Is it really all about money? Are the solutions that we’re seeking only reachable if we throw more money at it the problem? Or does seeing solutions only in our ability to spend money blind us to the real causes that need changing?

Like millions upon millions of others these days, Michael and Amayra Hamilton who formed a community and retreat in Angel Valley, Arizona (www.angelvalley.org), about 10 miles south of Sedona, have themselves been grappling with “the money issue.”

Dedicated to creating a new, workable morphic field from which a paradigm, and eventually a way of living that is not necessarily money dependent may form, the Hamilton’s have often found themselves yet paying homage to what seems like the god of money.

So it was quite the jaw dropper when they scheduled a private session with Cynthia Williams (www.universalheartofoneness.com), trance medium, to seek spiritual guidance. Expecting to hear the soft reassuring energetic presence of the heavenly realms in the Universal Heart or Dolphin Pod of One, they were introduced to the most unexpected, but appropriate “energy”… of money itself, which proclaimed itself to be “god of this world.”

He makes a good point.

The Hamilton’s shared an excerpt from their “conversation” with the god of money at a recent retreat where a group of people gathered to examine our perceptions of money, and how to transcend them.

Part I

Part II

Maui, Hawaii

The last several years have immersed me deeper into the subject of health; factors that keep it around, as well as those that tend to make it go away. We are led to believe that ‘disease’ is something that “comes-a-visiting”, victimizing some and passing by others, and then leaves. It’s really a latter day a fairy tale, except that so many people believe that it is true. Sadly, too many are living, and dying in that belief.

There is no such thing as a “disease” in the context that we have grown accustomed to viewing things. However, there is a state of balance or imbalance, sufficiency and insufficiency, which affects immunological weakness, or strength. When our immune system is strong, then “disease” will not — cannot — affect us. When our ecological system is in balance, then our immune system will be strong. It’s that simple. And when we look at “disease” in the context of balance, nutritional and microbial sufficiency, etc., the best way to respond to health challenges will look very different than they predominantly do today.

Hydration is fundamental to the functional sufficiency of the human body. Water is the catalyst, carrier, and facilitator of life on all levels, outer and inner, from the blood that courses through our arteries and veins, to the inner ocean that the cells exist in, to the air that we breathe. We are an ocean of water, and also exist within an atmospheric one. Yet, we are generally ignorant about water, and our relationship to it. Since it all looks alike, it becomes no surprise that there’s something unseen about what differentiates one water from the next, and that lies within the energy that it does, or does not contain. An energy rich water will do what it is designed to do; deliver life force to the cells, and take waste out of them, and out of the body itself. When that process is done routinely, the human body can last hundreds of years, and in good health. Yet, most of the water that we consume is devoid of energy, but high on energetic frequencies that tend to dissipate and “defract” the coherency of the light, in the form of bio-photons, that optimal, energy-rich water, would naturally deliver.

So it has been an eye-opening experience for me to learn about structured water, to understand its nuances, to find corroboration and substantiation of concept from independent sources, and to bring it to you.

Below is the latest.

Recently, when I traveled home to Chicago to visit family, I learned of Vicki Frank, who had experienced amazing improvements in her family’s health after installing Clayton Nolte’s water structuring devices in her home. This was after spending quite a bit of money on very sophisticated in-home water filtration and treatment systems. They made the water acceptable as far as municipal (molecular) standards were concerned, but it was still unsafe to use. In other words, there was still something in the water that was making everyone in the Frank family sick, particularly the children.

Her nine year search for a satisfactory solution change dramatically after installing three whole-house structuring devices; two for the rather large home, and one to support the underground sprinkler system that waters the outdoor plants and vegetation.

Being a scant three-hour drive from Chicago, I was happy to visit Vicki and interview her for Talk For Food with my brand new Panasonic AG-HMC-155 solid state High Definition video camera. It arrived the day before. Her 11 year-old son was a wonderful production assistant while we did the interview. He even got his own video camera out and videotaped me doing the interview.

Below is a short piece from that visit.

Listen

This is a link to the full Talk For Food podcast on Webtalkradio.net [When this show goes off rotation and the link is no longer active, please let me know and I'll move it to another location.]

Purchase

The products referred to in these conversations are available online by clicking here.

Show #013 — Guest: Jim Humble

Taken in Hermosillo, Mexico

Adam explores the possibility of moving beyond simply “surviving” cancer, and living again assisted by the “Miracle Mineral Supplement,” or MMS. His guest is Jim Humble, author of Miracle Mineral Supplement of the 21^st Century, and developer of the protocol. This was Jim’s third visit to Talk For Food, as the buzz about MMS continued to grow.

Jim shares insights learned weekly from feedback received, including suggestions on taking it on an empty stomach, time of day, and in conjunction with vitamin C.

The shift to grain feeding from grass, has had an immeasurable impact on human health.

Show #046 – ‘A Matter of Grain vs. Grass’

Guest: Gearld Fry

Many health conscious individuals have advised against eating “red meat,” which generally means beef. However, there are indigenous cultures in various parts of the world for whom beef and dairy products are central parts of their diets, and yet are free of the diseases that have become associated ingesting red meet or drinking cow’s milk. Adam’s guest, Gearld Fry, a bovine geneticist, suggests that other factors at play that make beef products “unfit” for human consumption.  And there are ways to change them.

Mr. Fry explains the genetic and health consequences of the shift from grass feeding to grain feeding. Conversation includes a frank description of the effects of the growth hormone rBST.

Click the player below to listen to this conversation (Length: 59:30)

Gearld Fry’s web site: www.bakewellrepro.com

I sat down yesterday to write about developments that are unfolding relative to the growing public consciousness and understanding of structured water, and instead wrote about the passing of Senator Edward M. Kennedy (1932-2009) and how it reinforced our perception of likely outcomes when dealing with brain cancer (and cancer in general) under current conventions of medical care. Whether drinking structured water would have changed the timing and circumstances of Senator Kennedy’s transition is subject to speculation, but all indicators suggest that doing so would have, as it would for all of us, irrespective of our state of health. To illustrate, I’ll now write about what I intended to cover in the first place.

Our story begins with a group of plants, some really “contented” and now healthier cows from Arizona, and ends with unexpected developments from Germany.

Getting a handle on this structured water concept can be a challenge for linear, “show me the numbers,” left brain-dominant people. Evidence is there, mind you, but you sometimes have to look for it differently. As a first impression, upon taking my first shower with structured water, I noticed that it feels “wetter” than what was coming out the showerhead only minutes before. I now understand that this feeling is what is generally referred to as “soft.” This is one indication of smaller cluster sizes and higher density and hence greater oxygen content in the water. Structured water shows great promise as a salt-less water softener. And as this missive moves along, you’ll see another area of great potential.

Another piece of evidence of higher available oxygen content in structured water is in how it affects living things that don’t have intellects and egos. Plants and animals qualify as part of that population.

A simple test was to simply take a couple of plants and water them, with tap water, and with water that has been structured. We did this with basil, actually purchasing three pots and a pack of seeds, which were planted. One pot was watered with tap water and another with structured water (run through the kitchen faucet that has an under-sink unit installed).

The water of the third pot had first been warmed in the microwave, cooled off with some ice, then applied to the planet. While it did sprout, seedlings were sparse. It never thrived, and in a short period of time, was gone.

The surviving plants grew up in the summer heat of central Arizona, where the ground surface temperature is easily enough to fry eggs by day, and perhaps run “slow cook” food by night.

Yet, during this time, the both plants pushed through the surface and formed according to design. The plant that was nourished with structured water eventually grew larger, and proved to be the more robust of the two.

That the plant fed with structured water grew larger might have been expected, though if that weren’t the case, I would have written that too. What was not expected was seeing that the structured water-fed plant was robust beyond size.

Day-after-day, as the summer intensity reached its zenith, the air temperature rose well over 100° (F.), frequently between 110° and 115° reaching as high as 119°. I didn’t choose to cook any eggs, but the ground surface temperature, which radiated back on the plants too, was easily able to do so.

The unexpected observation had to do with sunburn. The tops of some of the leafs on the tap water fed plant began to brown, which could easily have been expected given the intense, direct sunlight heat it had endured each day. However, the leafs of the structured water fed plant remained a rich green, and was quite aromatic.

This observation changed my understanding of our susceptibility to sunburn from sun exposure. The degree to which we may be susceptible to sunburn appears to be more a statement to the quality of the water that one is drinking (and hence, hydration), than sun radiation. More evidence to this notion comes from people who have experienced sunburn getting quick relief after taking a shower in structured water. The extra available oxygen restores the balance in the skin.

Buoyed by these developments and looking for more, I contacted a friend who owns the only dairy producing raw, unpasteurized milk in the state of Arizona. Jackie C. is the one who originally brought Sally Fallon (Weston A. Price Foundation), and Mark McAfee (Organic Pastures) to my attention. Both eventually became guests on my radio show, with my Organic Pasture’s visit being part of my first road trip in 2008 to Northern California.

Raw milk producers walk a tightrope. They produce a balanced, nutrient dense food, which contains real vitamin D, live enzymes, and beneficial bacteria, the stuff that antibiotics kill off, but that prescribing physicians rarely concern themselves with replenishing. Yet, when you read a raw milk label, you’re informed that since the product is not pasteurized, it “may contain organisms injurious to your health.”

This is enough for most uninformed people put the raw milk down (where it’s available), and get the pasteurized milk. Yet, pasteurized milk labels don’t say that it contains synthetic vitamin D, has no natural digestive enzymes, nor any live aerobic bacteria. Did you read the recent Washington Post article stating that 70% of children through young adult are deficient or insufficient in vitamin D? We have cultivated such deficiencies into the behaviors that are encouraged and discouraged. Government enforced pasteurization of dairy products, including the “organic” variety, are woefully lacking in real nutritional value that actually contribute to human health. On the other hand, if they’re allowed to sell at all, producers of products that do help, such as raw milk and dairy products, are forced to include misleading labeling that most consumers won’t take the time to see beyond.

Perhaps it is for that reason that Jackie C. named her operation, Save Your Dairy (www.saveyourdairy.com). However, she was excited about the prospects of learning about structured water, and after meeting Clayton Nolte, the device’s inventor, agreed to install two units, one that would structure the water that the cattle drinks,

You can see the structuring unit just below the pump in the above image.

Another unit was installed to structure the water that is pumped to a holding tank that supplies all the buildings on the property. You can see a close-up of the device in the picture below.

The first unit was installed in early July, after taking a couple weeks to measure the cows’ water consumption patterns. The second one was installed several weeks later.

I visited the dairy last week and talked to Mick, who manages the facility. They observed an immediate change in drinking patterns. The cows drank less water. The herd (130 head) had been drinking around 1,800 gallons of water per day for several days. Then, consumption would spike to over 4,000 gallons, then return to the lower level. After the structuring devices were installed, water consumption leveled off to around 1,800 gallons each day.

This would support an expectation of improved hydration, as the cattle drink according to thirst, and stop when that thirst has been satisfied. While this was a pleasant, and you might say “positive” outcome, it wasn’t enough for Mick consider the structuring devices had a significant impact. The real issue was that the water source that his cattle draw from, a nearby well, was believed to infested with a strain of Staphylococcus bacteria.

According to Wikipedia, Staphylococcus, which include aerobic and anaerobic forms, can (as an anaerobe) cause a wide range of diseases in humans and animals either through toxin production or invasion.

The now famous term “MRSA” stands for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a bacterium that no longer responds to beta-lactam antibiotics, which include penicillin and cephalosporins.

So Mick had a far greater problem weighing on his mind. If the well water was indeed full of Staphylococcus, what would the drinking water have? If the drinking water was full of Staph, then what good would a structuring unit be? Furthermore, the presence of an anaerobic microorganism in structured would be counter-indicated, because structured water is optimal, and living. The bio-photon energy that accompanies a structuring event manifests as abundant, stable oxygen. If the inventor’s statements were true, then there should be no Staphylococcus in the herd’s drinking water.

When I visited, the lab tests were still out, so we discussed possible “Plan B” approaches to bacteria control that would not require pumping the animals with antibiotics. One option was MMS — sodium chloride — into the water supply. The chlorine dioxide generated would oxidize the anaerobic microorganisms in the drinking water, producing no carcinogenic byproducts.

It was a moot point by that afternoon. The lab results were in. The lab confirmed the presence of Staphylococcus in the well water, but found ZERO bacteria in the structured drinking water sample. He was one excited dude! No bacteria, produced with no antibiotics! Jackie is now the owner of the first dairy in the world to produce structured milk!

On the heels of this development, an order came in for a Utopic Water garden unit. Destination, Elzweiler, Germany, about 130 Km southwest of Frankfurt. It’s amazing and gratifying to see how people from around the world are learning of this technology, as well as paying the prohibitive import duties — obviously set up to deter trade between nations — in order to avail themselves of the structured water experience.

Now I remind you that you can structure water. Each human being can, and is a water structuring agent. The caveat is that we must be in a joyful, loving state. When we perceive ourselves as being “stressed out” we leave our structure hat at the door, and are at the mercy of whatever we feel vulnerable to. A water structuring device allows us to gain the benefits of being conscious of our innate power and using it, even when we aren’t.

Within two weeks after that unit shipped to Elzweiler, a surprised Clayton Nolte, the unit’s inventor, received an email from the excited buyer, who indicated he had done tests on the water that flowed through the structuring unit. He said that a device they use to measure bio-photons had confirmed said emissions in water that had passed through the garden unit. They were gearing up to purchase more units of different sizes in order to expand their research.

This was good news, even encouraging news, but not necessarily GREAT news, that is, until Clayton sent a copy of the report to me. Printed the front page was the name Fritz-Albert Popp. This didn’t mean anything to Clayton, but rung a bell with me.

The study was titled, “Elektrolumineszenz von Wasser” which I take to mean “electro-luminescence on water.”

The researcher explains:

Blue graph lines are normal tabwater and red one for structured water-we use the water in Prof. Popp’s laboratory, where I directly connected the unit to the water source. Distilled water would show effects in the same way, which means that our water has capsuled the micro-particles into clusters, so they can not react anymore.

strong polluted water would have a higher score, because it has more dirt ( micro-particles) inside, which makes the water more electrolytic-more biophoton emisson-higher score!

In this researcher’s paradigm, less is more.

I mentioned being familiar with the name Fritz-Albert Popp, but initially, wasn’t sure where. It was from reading The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force in the Universe, by Lynne McTaggart. She devotes a chapter to his work, and includes numerous additional references throughout. Having your work independently and excitedly confirmed by a world renown bio-photonic researcher is a great way to start the day.

I eventually found an excerpt from The Field on Albert-Fritz Popp and read it to Clayton, so he could further appreciate the significance of the point in time that we have reached.

A new doorway has opened a tad more, as structured water history moves on.

The implications of Staphylococcus (or any anaerobe) without resorting to antibiotics, by using less to achieve more desired results, is mind-boggling, if enough people like you and me wake up. When we stop fearing nature, and actually return home, we have much to learn, and to gain. And just perhaps, we can live in better health for less, which I’m sure Senator Kennedy would have preferred.

You can listen to more, by listening to my conversation with Clayton on Talk For Food.

Relative to health care, and standards of treatment and outcomes that Americans have come to expect, Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s transition at the age of 77 represents a huge vote for the status quo. He becomes the latest high profile “poster child,” an example for what the public can expect with the best medical care, medical care we agree needs improvement, but think that the only way it will get better is if we throw more money at it.

For all the tributes that apply to his life and longevity, Mr. Kennedy’s death from brain cancer shows that it’s not the money that counts; it’s the method. And the current methods of treating diseases like cancer, perhaps especially cancer, need to be questioned, challenged, and changed.

What would a “better” health care system mean? The answer probably depends on who you’re asking. Ask the head of a pharmaceutical company or the American Medical Association, a better health care system might, mean that the public would get sicker sooner, but live longer, so that it can be billed (or bilked) for more money, before making our transition.

I write this as my step-father has an appointment scheduled to have a “permanent” catheter installed for dialysis, as part of his ongoing after-treatment from a stroke he had over two years ago. His last visit to the hospital generated a bill of $223,000. This was not the first $200,000-plus bill he and my mom have received in the past year alone. Clearly, strokes are very good business for the medical profession.

Talking to my mom the other day, she recounted how, on one visit, a second doctor stopped by to say “hello” to Josh… not much more than that, apparently at the request of his attending physician. That five minute exchange of pleasantries showed up as a $349 entry on their bill. The only people getting care from this system are those earning a living off of keeping you alive, but sick. Health is not the Prime Directive of our health care system; breathing is, as long as it’s billable. If it can’t bill you, then even breathing is no longer important.

I say “our” euphemistically when referring to the health care system because while I will transition from this world at some point in space/time just like everyone else, it will not be in servitude to a medical system that doesn’t serve my best health interests.

I’m sure that most people believe that Senator Kennedy’s best health interests were served (just like Michael Jackson’s), but most who hold that opinion have virtually no concept of bio-chemical and even less about the bio-energetic factors that impact human health.

Deaf to the effects of chemical toxicity and dumb to energetics, it is in virtual darkness that medicine is both taught, and practiced today.

Millions are suffering from behaviors that, through careful acculturation, have made a large portion of the population into frogs that have been lowered into a pot of water that has been brought to a boil. The sad thing is that even the “leaders” don’t know what they’re supporting. The medical people who are treating them aren’t questioning the efficacy of their own methods, and the medical schools — largely funded by pharmaceutical companies — aren’t supporting study that has anything other than a molecular basis.

Nanotechnology, the latest darling in many research circles, is still molecular based. Energetics will always trump the molecular, for the molecular comes from it. It is from the level of energetics that answers have been found, and from whence “new” ones will be discovered. But don’t “ask your doctor” about that today, he’ll give you a pill.

Expect more appeals for money to “fight” cancer. Expect more walks and runs for “the cure.” Forget the fact that cancer has always been curable, and always will be, if we change the environment that brings it into being. In other words, when we bring ourselves and our body back into balance, both chemically and energetically, cancer will leave on its own, for its purpose — which is to SUSTAIN life — will have been served.

Killing cancer tumors via toxification is futile. That is how the environment that supports cancer tumor growth is actually fed. Chemical toxification is already the problem when cancer cells grow. Oxygen depravation in certain parts of the body, brought on by many factors, some of which are associated with ingesting foods that are devoid of nutrient value and laced with synthetic chemicals with their bio-disruptive energetic frequencies — leads to a proliferation of organisms that don’t require oxygen in order to live. They are referred to as anaerobic.

Anaerobic microorganisms are present to prevent the macro-organism, that is, the indwelling human being, from expiring due to the spread of necrosis. If an area is oxygen deficient, cells die. If no anaerobic microorganisms come to that location and, like firefighters, cordon it off, then more cells die. Death will spread, and you’d have no physical body to be here in.

So what does medical science do? They administer drugs that are designed to kill the anaerobic microorganisms, viral, bacterial, etc. However, these drugs increase the oxygen deficiency due to their own toxifying effect. Furthermore, they interact with other chemicals in the body, creating even more toxins, some known, and some that are unknown. Each of these actions take the body chemistry further out of balance, making pH (potential Hydrogen) levels down into the “acidic” range which eventually activates cancer cells — for our survival.

As another example, surgical procedures create a very real disturbance within an individual’s energy field. Every living being has an energy field, which few are able to see, and medicine presently dismisses altogether. Caesarian sections create disturbances within a mother’s energy field, which impact her health, as well as that of the child. Yet, the medical system is ignorant of such nuances. It would mask its ignorance with dismissal and suppression, if not an outright attack on those with such “woo woo” ideas.

History is rife with examples of how the medical profession has gone after individuals who came up with “the right stuff” to end cancer, and other expressions of a body or mind out of balance. Royal Raymond Rife, inventor of an amazing microscope that magnified live cultures over 20,000 times in the early 1930’s, is one example. His is certainly not an isolated case. And, there are many who have succeeded in curing their cancer and other disease conditions using non-toxic methods, but they are “hush” about it, fearing retribution. Why?

Why should people feel they have to speak in secret code about methods that work? Why are they not celebrated? Why should they feel they need to be careful about “offending” the FDA, AMA, or any other agency whose practices aren’t serving the best interests of humanity? The simple answer is, they shouldn’t.

When will we wake up?

Will we wake up before, or after 190 million people are given H1N1 vaccinations? Do you understand that those injections include chemicals that will wreak havoc on your body chemistry (and that of your children), and that your immune system is more capable of protecting you — when it is in balance — than anything that takes you further out of balance?

Why have we cultivated so little understanding of our physiology? Why isn’t this simple truth spoken in schools? Instead, public school systems are the leading proponents of chemical dependency in our youth, insisting that parents — many of them young and impressionable — must consent to having their children be inoculated as a condition of school enrollment. This is extortion, pure and simple.

Whether I agreed with his politics or not, I believe that Senator Kennedy cared for America and did the best he could, based on his best understanding of what was possible. I certainly believed that his brothers John and Robert did this. They threatened to change the system, and were killed for their convictions. Ted Kennedy didn’t go the route of his brothers into death, but his passing is no less saddening, no less important for what it means to all of us.

In choosing his method of health care, Ted Kennedy protected the interests of “big medicine” with “big government,” and in transition, he embodied what many have come to expect. From where he sits now, I hope he sees this. But more importantly, I hope those who remain start to see the medical “Medusa” that is hiding so blatantly, in plain sight because, the more we look to medicine and don’t understand ourselves (since it’s not being taught in school), we take the slow, expensive train ride, deeper into disease. While it appears that’s just the way the system wants things to unfold, the final decision ultimately rests within each of us.

Taken in Hermosillo, Mexico

A friend of mine just wrote to me, inquiring about a rumor of a plan to arrest Jim Humble. Jim has far better things to do than get arrested, some of which has, can, or will affect you, especially as so many people gear up their fears about “the pandemic.”

Franklin Roosevelt made the statement, “there’s nothing to fear, but fear itself,” famous; a truth many have either forgotten, or in this age of misinformation masquerading as education, have never learned. FDR’s statement is as true today as it was then, particularly because it is now our turn to inform and equip ourselves to ensure the health and safety of ourselves, families, communities and nations. Unfortunately, the “enemy,” if we’re going to look at things in those terms, is not “over there,” it is “us.”

I choose to see life and the events that are unfolding in terms of “my ‘enemy’ being my friend.” Instead of something or someone to fear, or be “on guard” against, the adversary should be embraced, observed, welcomed, and understood. Ultimately, as understanding grows, so does our power to diminish the risk that exposure or engagement may have posed.

The man who transformed the acronym “MMS” into a term that, with regard to matters of health restoration, has become synonymous with “workable solution,” has seen one too many people who helped humanity with their use of common sense (woefully uncommon these days), come up missing in action. It seems that the only popular “heroes” we celebrate today are those whose actions tended to maintain the status quo, while those who follow their heart’s vision to change paradigms may very well feel a need to go on the run. My hat is off to veterans to have risked and lost their lives fighting for what they believed to be “freedom,” but history is now revealing that they most often fought to maintain a certain world tension, that a few profited heavily from, at the expense of many. That pattern continues to this day, as we gear up mentally for an unseen enemy, for a “battle” proposed to be fought inside the body of humanity.

The problem is that overwhelming evidence points to the administrators of “the solution” — a vaccine that was designed (but not tested) to address the Swine Flu — are also creators of “the problem.”  Evidence indicates that it is totally unlikely that Nature could ever, or would ever have brought the concoction that is now referred to as H1N1. This has all the markings of being human-made. And yet, few are questioning why.

While the President holds meetings about health care system reform, no one challenges him to address the now appreciated potential dangers of Swine Flu treatment, with the apparent support and approval of everyone in government from the FDA to the National Guard.

Jim Humble, who saw the potential of chlorine dioxide to safely clean out the human plumbing system, stands in stark contrast to the bureaucracy that prepares to dump more toxicity in, as a means of “protecting” the population from the dreaded bug. Never mind that history reveals most deaths from flu epidemics past indicate that the greatest loss of life was by people who took the vaccines.

I will contend here, however, that it wasn’t the vaccines that killed these people. It was fear, pure and simple. They killed themselves, as we always do. No one leaves this world until they are ready to, but many people believe that these matters are out of their hand, so they are susceptible to suggestion.

Well, I’m suggesting that there’s nothing to fear, not Swine Flu, or even the vaccine. However, there is much to understand… about ourselves, our human and spiritual nature, and about our sovereignty as intelligent, volitional beings. What does that mean? We have the power to take in information, apply reasoning to it, and make a choice… a decision. That decision does not have to agree with anyone else’s. If everyone around you is fearful, it doesn’t mean that you need to be fearful too.

While the medical and government bureaucracy openly prepares to feed poison into healthy people for fear of the effects of a man-made virus with a non-tested drug born from some kind of sweetheart deal, Jim Humble presently travels through Africa, keeping himself off the radar, but staying as relevant as ever, and as involved.

Somewhere in Africa, Jim speaks to a group of 500 nurses.

The next edition of the MMS Newsletter (www.mmsnews.org) is about to run two articles by Jim Humble, relative to MMS and the Swine Flu. The first one is titled, “At Stake: Your Life and the Life of Your Loved Ones.” The second one is “Resources Related to the 2009 Pandemic and Health Issues.”

That’s what I want. I want people who see the sense of this miracle chemical. They should purchase it at a low price without coercion. No MLM, no recruiting, or clever marketing. We don’t need more customers, we need people to be freed of the pathogens they are hosting. People should not have to spend their last dollar treating a life threatening disease. — Jim Humble

With a new hat.

He’s as passionate and pragmatic as ever.

More than one million people in the US have used MMS since 2006. Another million people have used MMS throughout the rest of the world. It is made in every country of Europe, plus Australia, South Africa, Mexico and many other countries. — Jim Humble

Not sitting on his laurels, he is also introducing a complement to MMS, which he has dubbed, “MMS2.”

You can learn more about MMS2 by listening to my recitation of an introduction paper he wrote.

Click here to listen.

No, we don’t have anything to fear, if we keep an open mind, know our options, and listen to others who are informing with reason, and not inciting fear.

At Stake: Your Life and the Lives of Your Loved Ones